Softw ar property there atomic number 18 m some(prenominal) guidances of evaluating the peculiar(prenominal) of character package. Quality is defined as having the highest or finest rough-cutplace to fulfill the dissolve of the software package package ineluctably. The purpose is employ to conclude those characteristics that should be used to evaluate its superior. One characteristic very some(prenominal) used is the number of defects encountered in the software.
packet enables a reckoner to perform specific tasks, as opposed to the physical components of the system, hardware. This includes coat software much(prenominal) as a word processor, which enables a user to perform a task, and system software such as an operating system, which enables other software to run properly, by interfacing with hardware and with other software or custom software made to user specifications (Wikipedia, 2007).
Software that contains few defects is considered to ca-ca high quality than software that contains many defects. Software must be able to be trusted and accurate in swan to provide a correct result. This dependability is one of a number of view loads of com localizeer software which target be gear up safen into consideration when determining the quality of the software (Wikipedia, 2007).
The dramatizeing are a rock of software applications that Bristol-Myers Squibb uses and rely on: ? intelligence activity processing (Microsoft Word 2003) ?Spreadsheet (Microsoft Excel 2003) ?Presentation (Microsoft PowerPoint 2003) ?Corporate calendar (Oracle) ?Web browser (Microsoft Internet Explorer) ?Adobe Acrobat 7.0 (BMS.2007) After evaluating the quality of the company software, one can understand the importance of software running to full productivity level. If the software is not running(a) properly, it may jeopardized the integrity of the company. Making sure that information engine driver is up-to-date with all software issues.
References Bristol-Myers Squibb Company. (2007). The Bristol-Myers Squibb. Retrieved April 24, 2007 from http://www. bms.com/ Wikipedia. (2007). Software Quality Retrieved April 24, 2007, from http://en.wikipedia.org /wiki/Software
This looks desire you unavoidable to write ccc haggle in 15 mins and you used lots of cramming techniques like over-using acknowledgments.
You stated the straightforward, and didnt show many reasons. I dont think you needed to define the basics.
Who would not guess that a software with dwarfish errors is wagerer than one with many? No sir, this is not nice fair to middling and everything you wrote except for the first paragraph is from Wikipedia. Boy do I hate when people write roots found on Wikipedia, sure its easy nevertheless not thoroughly sufficiency!
A few mistakes here and there but with a bit of work it could be a lot better but its all very basic.
There is far in like manner neat detail round a highly varied topic.
Wikipedia is not ALWAYS true, since people can openly edit topics which may not be the correct information. So therefore you should of used much websites to gain information to pad out the sample.
Extremely short and they cite wikipedia as a source. You should lengthen it and mystify a to a greater extent received source than wikipedia.
Too simple for an act, less of point and debates...further wikipedia is not a credible references source...please remember it is not digest to use as a source of references.
couple typos and format errors. its not all too great.
I agree it seems like an undertake written by a high school educatee 10th horizontal surface.
Although this was a decent attempt at an carry, this isnt one. First, it doesnt follow proper experiment structure; second, the three arguments ( as yet off if you followed proper canvass structure) are far too short; third, this does not visualise college standards; fourth, as many people keep back stated: wikipedia is not a reliable source.
This is a very well started essay but it is too short. You need to develop the essay with to a greater extent informations.
I think that this essay is too short to be called an essay. I would appellation it a note, although it does pertain important information it could have had much detail to the programs and what they do.
This is so vague, I dont know about you but I am in IT also and find so much more to put into a paper than this. I saw another comment that you need to be more sure on quoting your sources.
Most of the information is just rehashed common knowledge for anyone barely computer literate. I suggest more thorough research to present a more informatory read and to use more reliable sources than the notorious Wikipedia.
You scarce get into the essay before it ends. It needs to be endless and to use a more reliable source than Wikipedia.
Although the bulk of this essay was decent, you added a list in the middle of it. . . You should have integrated it into your textual matter. Further, I felt your arguments were far too short. They had adept ideas; however , you should flip ones lid on them. Further, although wikipedia is a substantially head start point for research, you need to have a more reliable source.
This essay is okay but it is too short. The arguments are good but their are far too few. Also well-nigh of the essay comes from one source which can lead to inaccuracy.
the title is good but if you can elaborate more n i mean much much much more..... it would be nice....
This article is almost word for word from other sources, for role model the second paragraph is the beginning of this article http://www.sciencedaily.com/articles/c/computer_so ftware.htm
Not solitary(prenominal) are some of the statements obvious, there not original work.
This essay is not thorough enough and seems to be only on the surface. The language is not formal enough and does not meet the standard of a college undergraduate. It seems like an essay written by a high school bookman 10th grade.
Software that contains few defects is considered to have higher quality than software that contains many defects.
I suppose some readers tycoon think this is profound. I think it is so completely obvious that I wonder that anyone had to write it.
grammar and sentence structure needs a runty work, it is quite shocking that someone in undergraduate school wrote this. It looks as though a grade school kid did it.
This kind of information can be found on many data bases and internet sites and are stronger worded than this essay
was this paper written in five minutes or what. It seems to be plagiarized and wikipedia is not a source that colleges even take. Way too short needs more lucubrate!!!
this is a very strongly worded essay, but i personally think it may need more details or information as it looks a little short to me.. but this is just my opinion... hoped it helped :D
This paper is not bad for a three hundred word max paper. I do suggest that you confirmation using wikipedia since it is no longer a site that can be used by universities. Also be careful with plagiarism, try using your own aspects or reiterate and cite.
I am actually taking business management myself-- I,m on my run short block for my associates--and if I would have ever turned in an essay like this it would have been thrown out--Wikipedia is not delicious as a reference past the second block of classes in my college--However, on a positive note: If this were study notes I would say--Great Job!!--This would probably be profitable in preparation for a final paper--However, you lead need to paraphrase rather than quote so much of your information... If this was study notes--Maybe you will want to be more careful how you list document in here for the next time--
good start, very vague..
expand on your points and think of at least 2 more oh and never use wikipedia
your lecturers wont accept it for your bibliography!
it seems that this is not an essay
but rather a report on software and its qualities
however, it is still useful
better mass next time mate
This plagiarized piece of work that any body can pull of the internet is an essay???? get rid of at once!!!!!
The arguments you pose are far too brief and additionally wikipedia is not a reliable source too use.
Looks to have more citations that actual thought put into it, and to quote several people, Wikipedia is not a credible source, dont even think about using it in a college paper. rundown half of the original thoughts are plagiarized.
For College, Undergraduate level this text is far too short and simple. TODAY A 10year aged(prenominal) child can tell more about software even without wikipedia. Not to speak about the definition of Quality. There are tones of materials to be described and discussed about both Software and Quality.The title of the text is very promissing but the rest is ...just nothing.
I thought this was going to be a good report. Instead I find it to be stuff that is written in 5 minutes. Nothing useful here!
Seems to be plagiarized at a time from the references the author gives. Also, wikipedia is just not a strong enough source to use in papers anymore.
The information is somewhat bland, more information would be more helpful. Maybe expand your essay a little more to help draw poker readers in.
This essay lacks clarity which makes it sink into a meaninglessness hole. What is the purpose of this essay? It barley even talks about software.
This essay is too short.
&& wikipedia isnt a credible reference.
You could of added a lot more information.
I agree with previous posts,but useful and interest stuff there and also you should explain a little more in details.
This essay has goos startup, but it is too short. agent needs to put more detail in to the essay and then it will be fine.
started of OK but focusing to short far a complex topic. more/more reliable sources needed. some obvious typos.
quite easy to take information from.
youve been on the pending list for ages and you have got way better ratings than me...but how come youre still on the pending list?
I agree with previous posts, very short but useful and interesting stuff there!
(,)
like title says it would be much better and more interesting if u had elaborated more on those software
The beginning seems to be clear but its only a few definitions. More details will make it very appealing.
The work youve done already is good.(I lied I meant very good) You just need to extend the amount of words by a lot.
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment