Each individuals journey through life is unique. Some will perk up the journey al hotshot, others in loving relationships-maybe in trades union or other forms of commitment. We need to consider our own choices and try to catch the choices of others. Love has many shapes, forms, and colors, moreover many people birth a hard time coming to that realization. On November 18, 2003, Massachusetts highest dally decl bed that same-sex couples have a constitutional right to marriage, suitable the first nation to declare this. Many people, both in favor of and against this decision, were interviewed and spoke out as to why they tone how they feel. The real question this article poses is, should same-sex couples have the same rights to marriage as opposite-sex couples? There are many different viewpoints and theories associate to this ethical dilemma, which include egoists, social contract theory (Thomas Hobbes), consequentialist and utile beliefs, Immanuel Kant and deontological ethics, and virtue ethics. Each viewpoint and system of belief differs from a nonher, yet they all make very strong, convincing points.
Egoists only do what would be in their own best interest to do. They mean that by acting selfishly, one creates a better world. establish on these and many other beliefs of theirs, they would be absolutely one hundred percent against same-sex marriages.
Same-sex marriages only really benefit those individuals getting married so there is no rational logical thinking as to why egoists would support this decision and they dont. It is no send out benefit to society or anybody else involved and therefore egoists would not be in favor of this. They are not gaining anything by this Massachusetts highest court decision. Also, this court aided gays and lesbians in many ways. They are making a statement to the world, really, that same-sex couples have the same rights and...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment