The Roles of the Main Players in A Canadian Criminal Law Case

The parting of a test is to preside over trials in our courts of law while exercising the virtues of integrity, impartiality and independence. It is the duty of a judge to uphold the rule of law to ensure bear upon treatment of everyone in pursuit of justice. A judge must also uphold the principles of the Canadian Constitution to protect the rights of person citizens, as well as to guarantee that Canadian principle does not exceed its boundaries. Judges must exercise their roles at three stages throughout the judicial process; the pre-trial, trial, and during sentencing. During the judicial pre-trial, it is the role of the judge to discuss matters of disclosure with both the prosecutor and disproof council, to hear evidence in dress to ensure in that respect is sufficient evidence for a trial, and (if necessary) to discuss possible sentences for a guilty plea. During the trial, the role of the judge is to rule on the admissibility of evidence, objections make by council and charter motions while simultaneously receiving the facts of the shimmy. A judge must then summarize the facts of the case, apply the facts to the law and file the jury, or make a ruling on the case.



During sentencing, a judge must consider the facts of the case, the principle of justice, and the aggravating and mitigating factors of the case and then determine an appropriate sentence for the offender.

The role of settle is seen in the case of R. Vs. Belance, a sentencing hearing in the master copy Court of Ontario. Mr. Belance has been convicted of second degree murder and his defence council, Gary Barnes is proposing the marginal punishment of life in prison with eligibility of parole later 10 years. On the other hand the crown prosecutor, gear up Holmes, is asking for...

If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper