.

Wednesday 10 April 2013

Capital Punishment of the Mentally Retarded in relation to A Lesson Before Dying - includes parenthetical citations and works cited.

Capital Punishment of the Mentally Retarded

A cordially retard man is supercharged with a crime that he has never committed. Regardless of his mental subject, he is sentenced to the death penalty, condemned to die as a hog. The dissentious idea of executing a mentally handicapped person polarizes most individuals into either fervently supporting or oppose the idea, but Ernest J. Gaines takes an eclectic combination of both ideas to form his avouch opinion.

Those that are proponents of capital punishment of the mentally disabled state that prisoners can easily claim to be retarded. A fairness stating that those with an IQ below 65 cannot be executed stirs up debate. If a man, realizing he may be executed for a crime he committed, takes an IQ footrace, he is likely to intentionally perform poorly on the test (Sharp).

Further more(prenominal), the scores for an IQ test can change up to ten points from test to test (Sharp). The lowest score can be interpreted and used in a court of law regular if another score is higher that 65. The idea that the mentally retarded should be punished less is arguable. Because one is incapable of consciously orchestrating a murder makes one less guilty? The upkeep is lacking, but the crime was still committed (Reinert). In A Lesson Before Dying, the judge that sentences Jefferson to the death penalty is of this opinion. He sees no reason that he should not pay for the part he played in this horrible crime.

On the other hand, opponents of the execution of the mentally retarded claim that it is in violation of the Eight Amendment as a cruel and unusual punishment.

Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!

Since 1976, there has been 34 mentally retarded offenders executed, three of those committed their crimes as juveniles (Jost). Those against the killing...

The intro is weak, claim is confusing. The writer just jumps into the paper without explaining the controversy. Needs a call passage. Passive voice is used throught, making the paper search like a conversation. Try using transtions to bridge the offend between your sentences.

Good Job..I like the arguments you put forth, and also the works cited is a slam dunk! hehe...oh well..I hope to see you write more well written pieces like this in the future!

If you compliments to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper

No comments:

Post a Comment