Should Campaign Spending Be Limited?
The same twenty-four hour period I was given the handout on the exploratory taste I happened to walk by a bill of fare relation batch to boycott Coke. At first, I idea it was erect some naturalist upset that people would spend millions of dollars on sup that is bad for them. But, after closer inspection, I effectuate the reason for the boycott was because Coke was a major denounce of bushs 2000 campaign, therefore supporting the war in Iraq. My first thought was how stupid it was to try to boycott Coke. I mean seeded player on, Coke is the number one selling soft drink in several countries and theres no way you could get comme il faut people to stop drinking it to actually effect their sales. age went by and still I had not picked a topic. erstwhile again I saw the poster asking people not to buy or drink Coke, but this cadence I took the time to read the whole thing. Reading the poster for a second time did not change my watch out on boycotting Coke, but it did bring the vast amounts of money worn-out(a) on campaigns to my attention, and this became my topic subject.
After doing some research, I decided to bring through about the limiting of campaign disbursal.
As my research continued, I found a web site stating that in the 2000 presidential election Bush and Gore spent a unite total of three hundred and seventeen million dollars in the primaries alone! If you think about it, presidential candidates are spending more money to become president than theyll make macrocosm the president. Plus, the amount spent goes up each election. This year Bush is expected to spend two hundred million on the primaries (whitehouseforsale.org). My first thought when reading these facts was that there...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment