Living in estonia as an architect

Not wanting to analyze the building of d rise uping houses in Estonia inefficiently and seemingly

scientifically (where would I have got competent statistics from), I simply rise to express the

thoughts which argon connected with that topics somehow and have bonk into my mind.

What kind of scientific analysis it could be or who should posit it, if even the architectural

critics seem not to manage with the simplest things. That reminds me an article in the EE

some time ago about a Finnish wench (naturally in Finland) completing or taking her doctors

degree. She was examining Finnish post-war late house, its morphology, the structure

of the Finnish family, the connections between them and making conclusions which extend

to this day. Those observations about architecture were more more smarter than those

that the most of self-confident architects could do. Unfortunately it has to be confessed that

I dont immortalize such a research work or sentiments in Estonian science, but no doubt,

they could be necessary. The typology of the houses used by most of the architects goes

back to the vitality model of the middle class at the end of the 19th century. That model was

idealized and carried on through a hundred of years up to the end of this century.



No doubt

that our living style is changing -- repeating banalities: paradigm changes -- as well as the

composition and make-up of the family. There was a news in a newspaper about Estonia

which declared that 50 % of the children are illegitimate (it is possible, of course, that some

parents live together without getting married officially) and 12,5 % of the born(p) children

know nothing about their fathers. The living with grandparents is not so general any more.

(As to the models of living it is worth of...

If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper