Karl Marx and Andrew Carnegie Essay

Through by history competitor has created bitter tension ming direct with neighborly sectionalizationes. arguing has occurred in every social structure that has knowed to this day. societal structure has been the determining factor of competition in essence the despicableer secernatees ache forever tried to compete with the wealthinessier companyes to seize their wealth and power the wideer the economical gap in the midst of the two opposing course of instructiones the fiercer the competition between them. Two highly esteemed and different commonwealth, Karl Marx and Andrew Carnegie, developed their ca function ideologies to declaration and ease class tension, that is, whether changes should be imposed on the structure and type of social classes. A nonher writer, Sam raw illustrates the effect of competition in the extreme. Within their opposing and contr oversial views, there lies the more efficient social-economic blockage a modified version of Carnegies argu handst, despite the fact that it has somewhat imperfections. The answer is determined by the acknowledgment by the powerful and the pie-eyed of certain responsibilities to the poorer classes. Each author feels that the competition within a capitalistic golf-club has definite effects on social structure exclusively disagree as to what this effect is.Competition exists in many forms and in our case it exists in the form of class struggles. The upper class, known as the materialistic, possess wealth and power over the lower class, known as the proletariats, that consists of the works class in rules of order. The battles between these two classes grow ranged from communicatory fighting to stages of bedlam and bloodshed. Financial stability completelyows the squiffy to fulfill their desires and stock by exploiting the working(a) class to a great degree. In response, the working class engages in competing with the wealthy to overcome their control and establish itself as the ruling class. Unfortunately, relatively few muckle in the poor class ever achieve this goal, thereby showing the level of difficulty of overcoming a higher class authority. To this day true equality has non been ceremonious instead some truce has developed, stemming from their dependency on from each one other.A very honorable and well-known socialist, Karl Marx, argued that capital should be soci onlyy and not privately owned. He analyzed the conflict between the proletariat and the bourgeois and claimed that the constant battlebetween them, the never ending subordination of the proletariat, has further established new classes, new conditions of oppression, and new forms of struggle in mail portion of the old. Marx believed that the bourgeois, the large middle class of merchants who rule hostelry, have corrupted all the old value of society and turned them into monetary ones. By this he is taking the intellectuals and artists of society, the honorable personnel (those res pected scientists and artists who contribute to society), and portrays how the bourgeois do them part of their workforce, thereby, removing all of their value in society.Marx is rather angry that unornamented competition between the bourgeois has created tension in society, and moreover, has removed the earthy values of society and replaced them with agonistic monetary ones. He believes that with the growing class of the proletariat, eventually they pass on all unite and overthrow the bourgeois in an effort to revolutionize society and create unified distribution of wealth that removes all conflicts and battles between the classes. Removing competition allow for enable society to thunder at a constant rate and revive the humanistic values of society. Unfortunately, such an economic system flowerpotnot exist because there will al shipway be people trying to garner more power and authority, and thereby aggregate large wealth that will throw off Marxs Utopian society.In relatio n to the pursuit of wealth and control, societys structure is probably determined by the demands of society. According to Sam Keen, people are raised consortly to the demands of their present society. If society demands a competitive economy then the mindset of the child will be that of a competitive one. However, if society is more complacent then people will be raised with a calm outlook on society without competition. Institutions (schools and industry) try to instill rigid beliefs according to societys demands. Since society has been based on the demand of goods it caused competition amongst the people that barter for these goods, thereby forming a competitive economy. Keen puts the snow-clad collared workers in a prospering position as opposed to the lively collar workers. here(predicate) again, the white collared employers lead society and have authority and control over the zesty collared workers, the employees. He argues that the white collared workers are always highl y regarded, but the blue collared workers, regardless oftheir income, will always be considered poor. In Keens point of view, the competitive economy is the way society needs will formulate itself. The problem is that Keen reflects on competition that is taken to the extreme. Competition in practice however, is not necessarily taken to this drastic extreme. In fact, analysis of extreme competition shows that it is not skilful, but a correspond account of a competitive society is rather useful.Another persuasion comes from one of the great industrialists, Andrew Carnegie, who attempted to explain and give reasons for the difference within the classes in a way that brought out the dependency of each class on the other and the responsibilities that each mustiness fulfill. Carnegie considered the biggest problem to be the beseeming distribution of wealth. He knew very well from his own experience of social mobility that it was every Americans dream. However, it was far from an eas ily achievable dream, which led him to develop a theory of social reliance, in which one class relies on the other. Theoretically, he saw the Law of Competition in the working world and realized that the wealthy business owners were the true benefactors to society. That competition brings out the true leading of society, who become the wealthy business owners. With the concentration of business, industrial and commercial interests, in the hands of a few, Carnegie depicted these intelligent leaders as the rare fruit of society.Carnegie clearly states, That this talent for organization and forethought is rare amongst men is proved by the fact that it invariably secures tremendous rewards for its possessor, no matter where or under what laws or conditions.(The Gospel of Wealth0 p.250) Here Carnegie is referring to the talent that allows those few men to organize and manage large corporations that inevitably provide large profits for them. Running a corporation has to invest profit otherwise it would be shut down, according to Carnegie who claims that there is no middle ground, only either/or. The closely intelligent and capable men develop these corporations and bring in large sums of profit that is rightfully theirs, according to Carnegie. Since the overbearing level of competition prevents the many from founding their own corporations, the ones that accompany are undoubtedly entitled to this great wealth that comes with it.However, Carnegie believed that this wealth comes with its own responsibilities which the rightful possessor of the wealth mustacknowledge. These responsibilities include contributing beneficial things to the customary such as educational institutions that will allow development to occur, similarly, beautification and entertainment centers that the average individual cannot give way to contribute. However, giving back to the public doesnt necessarily contribute to everyone. It will be limited to the ones that afford to find time to use these facilities since the less fortunate people who have to work long hours will not be able to use them due to time constrictions.As a Great Industrialist who possessed gigantic wealth, Carnegie was in a financial position that allowed him to take part in philanthropic events. He believed that the rich business owners possessed this wealth not only for their own use but for the emolument of society as a whole. Carnegie donated a large portion of his earnings to building libraries, parks, museums, medication halls, and other public resources. By doing so he was a life-time example to his theory that the Law of Competition was only beneficial to society. He explained that the inferior working class was not intelligent enough to benefit society. He did not believe in random charity giving, instead he felt that society should help those that will help themselves, people who need a push forward to start them again.He also felt that the people who were worthy of assistance, sel dom required it. With these truths taken into account, society could truly benefit from the wealthy and powerful industrialists. Carnegie embodied the wealthy individual as becoming the mere trustee and agent for his poorer brethren, bringing to their service his superior wisdom, experience, and ability to administer, doing for them better than they could do for themselves this is pointing out the benefit of competition as a electropositive influence on society. By his avouchment Carnegie illustrates the superiority of the wealthy class and the beneficence that it gives to the poor class of society. Since the poor class is not capable of managing and distributing wealth in society, the affluent must take upon themselves the responsibility of giving back to the community by apply their superior qualities and benefiting society to the best of their ability. In this social-economic structure, Carnegie builds his system of two say classes that compete against each other, yet are cod ependent for the benefit of one another.With all the viewpoints taken into account we can see that competition has allowed the better desirable people to run the economy. Society has developed a codependence on the wealthy and poor classes. Together, the working class, the proletariat, relies on its employers, the bourgeois to provide it with an immediate income to incarnate itself the employers benefit from the proletariats work, accumulate great wealth and take the responsibility upon them to act as the trustees of the proletariat and give back to them via the most efficient public donations. By fulfilling each classs responsibilities to each other, society will benefit as a whole and submit will occur for everyone. Marxs utopian society could not exist due to the greediness of people that would try to seize power, which would create competition. Keen has taken the view of competition in the extreme which is rather unrealistic. Allowing a moderate level of competition will have a positive effect on society. Like Carnegie, the few wealthy should possess great resources that enable them to become the trustees and benefit society in the aforementioned ways that an average individual cannot. Although giving back to society is partially unavailing as previously noted, it is a more balanced system of Carnegies competitive social structure.P.S-Allegorically speaking, the two competitive classes, the proletariat and the bourgeois, can be viewed as a supersaturated solution. A solvent organism the wealthy employers, the solute being the enormous working class and the undissolved particles delusion on the bottom the unemployed. Hypothetically, the wealthy class possesses total control over its solute, meaning how much it will be dissolved.