'Persuasion in “12 Angry Men”\r'

'In his article, â€Å"The demand Art of public opinion”, Jay conger eel stated that idea is non roughly selling or convincing; rather, it is a larn and negotiating process. costly extendrs wont and gain up ones mind to ongoing and active discussions (or debates) to m white-haired around their auditory modality and embroil different opinions into a sh be conclusion. In the movie â€Å"12 Angry Men”, jurywoman phone tally 8 (Henry Fonda) was not sure if grounds presented against a young defendant in court left common landsensical doubt for a discredited conviction.The different jurywomans gestated the presented events and the defendant’s back basis warrants a punishable conviction. The movie showed how juror emergence 8 persuasively got the an an early(a)(prenominal)(prenominal) jurors to review distributively fact logically, which led to an unanimous not guilty decision. Conger celebrated four infixed stairs use in in force(p) idea. The flavors will be use to analyze juror form 8 persuasion approach. The first ingrained step is establishing credibility with an audience. Conger famous that persuaders, to get jut for an idea, be possessed of to build reliance and trustfulness with their audience.A person washbasin be persuasive by having a thorough sleep withledge and view of a subject affair OR relationships with community who trust the person’s motives. This is an master(prenominal) first step because people are allowing the persuader to persuade them and are committing time and resources towards the idea. imprecate is innate. An audience needs to see and know if the persuader can execute sound judgment honestly. In the movie, juror tally 8 displayed an ability to decipher real facts from questionable facts logically and sensibly when ask roughly the express presented during the trial.His character†unconnected juror repress 3, who was testy in a ostracize way†was calm, approachable and straightforward. He listened to to each one juror’s opinions astir(predicate) the murder shield and spoke respectfully and frankly about the preventative of conclusion to juror number 2 (bank teller). jurywoman number 8 gained credibility and trust from the different jurors using his character. The second essential step is framing business nervous strains straightlacedly. It is particular to identify the tangible benefits and determine that really matters to people cosmos persuade.Effective persuaders consider what is important to an audience and lays his or her position to disturb common ground with the audience. This is a give-and-take process. Effective persuaders likewise use testimonies, past and up-to-the-minute research, etc and re rig their argument to make them appealing to their audience. Persuaders must know an audience well copious to know what will view their immediate and continued wariness. jurywoman number 8 was in a situation where thither is no common ground between him and the other jurors.All are from diverse backgrounds and uncomfortably brought in concert to deliberate the facts in an open-and-shut murder trial. jurywoman number 8, wanting to â€Å"just lambaste”, kept reconsidering and adjusting his position with the other juror’s positions about the defendant until a common was reach in the deliberation. Again, this is a give-and-take process and is sanitary if properly done right. The three essential step is presenting evidence to an audience. Conger stated that evidence alone will not convince an audience to nourish a position or an idea.Evidence can appear as well as abstract and not alone informative. Persuaders, Conger noted, use stories, metaphors, analogies, examples, etc and use vivid language skilfully to paint a compel big picture of their efflorescence of view. This approach is far more(prenominal) effective than stating facts in persuasion. In the mov ie, juror number 8 used different testimonies from ad hoc jurors to pick apart each piece of evidence to support his argument for reasonable doubt. He used juror number 9 (old man) insights about the old man’s motives, and juror number 6 (painter) and his suffer experience hearing accept noises.The old man, seeking attention for the first time, assumed he hear voices. His motives and whether or not he really heard voices are questionable. He in any case used jurors’ number 4 (stock broker), 9 and 12 (ad man) comments about indentations on the 45 course old woman’s nose, indicating she wore eyeglasses. The woman’s beholding is questionable and she is not a reliable witness. The other jurors’ testimonies gave a clearer and more convincing argument for reasonable doubt. The fourth essential step is connecting emotionally to a belief and with the audience.Good persuaders walk along a fine line balancing a firm commitment to a position of view (i . e. , belief) and not getting emotionally carried away. If balanced properly, an audience will see and believe the sincerity in a persuader’s message. Good persuaders also know the sense modality of their audience. Conger stated that effective persuaders â€Å"have a strong and accurate sense of their audience emotional state…and adjust the tone of their argument accordingly. ” Persuaders gets a feel of their audience by listening to and gathering schooling from side conversations, or postulation people with better insights about the audience’s mood.Good persuaders invariably analyze their audience’s behavior and use the proper tone in messages to lucifer what the audience is feeling or expecting. Juror number 8 pretty much distanced himself from the other jurors. As he did, he listened to side conversations in the room, and notice the mood and temperament of each juror. He connected with each one accordingly and specifically. Juror number 3 (messenger utility owner), for example, is very vocal and release tempered. Juror number 8 approached him directly and firmly.He spoke respectfully and candidly about the burden of proof to juror number 2 (bank teller), who is timid and advantageously persuaded by other opinions. Juror number 8 eer kept analyzing this audience†the 11 other jurors. Juror number 8 broadly present Jay Conger’s essential steps to persuading people. In the movie, he mainly used persuasion faults by the other jurors to sustain his position and to change their minds. And he kept studying and analyzing what the other jurors were saying about the facts. Persuasion is definitely a reading and negotiating process, and knowing your audience is one-half the battle.\r\n'