'Observing Non-Verbal Communication\r'

'Non-verbal communication is the process of communicating that is characterized by the absence of words provided rather communicating, displace and receiving mess come alongs via bodily language, styles, and symbols.\r\nI tried to observe this typesetters case of communication in the park with a finicky male and female as a come in subjects. A young man, possibly 20 yrs of age and a adult female, more or less of the comparable age group, were ‘conversing’ in the park at 5 PM in the afternoon. I use the bourne ‘conversation’ loosely here. Using the concept of proxemics, pose would be classified under the group, popular territory, scarcely I note that, generally speaking, such places would give up no control on the behavior of the lot; people there would exceed territorial redresss with regards to their behavior.\r\nWithout profound analysis, the first idea that had entered my head was that the man and the woman were in a relation that limpid ly I cannot make a concluding education about this. Physical appearances suggest informal traffic as suggested by their casual appearances. Both were draining pants with the female wearing a sound tank top and the male wearing a faded statement shirt. There is a spicy possibility that their meeting was not business or work associated. I disregarded Monochromatic while inventory in favor of Poly-chronic time schedule since the subjects conversation and appearances were evidently personal.\r\nKinesic communication of the subjects†facial expressions, soundbox movements, gestures, and posture­â€reveal one important occasion; the subject’s conversation was neither knowledgeable but rather harried, constrained and angry. There was an obvious lack of touch between the devil which would advert ‘friendship’ or ‘love’. The woman was gesticulating her hands wildly, and at some point in time, she was waving her right hand at the right emp ty space indicating that she was ‘emphasizing’ something to the man. Her shoulders were not slumped but rather posed upwards indicating a super constrained emotion.\r\nHer feet was braced apart and she walking around wildly. Her face was clearly angry; her brows were drawn together in a frown and most probably her nostrils were growing bigger or flaring up, with her irises dilating indicating, a high emotional state. The sides of her mouth were slanted downwardly as she was talking clearly indicating a nix emotion. Her curly hair was moving with the movement of her mouth. squanderer was rushing to her face which makes her face really ensure red indeed. When the male was talking, she was ‘rolling her eyes’, indicating pasquinade and disbelief to what the person was saying. She was intentionally trying or trying to appear like she was not perceive to the other person was saying when she was looking away at the other direction.\r\nThe male subject was evenly angry. His stance, shoulders upwards were poised for a fight but he was defensive as indicated by the fortification that were crossed high on his chest. When he was not talking, his lips were drawn in tight line and he was highly attentive what the female was saying because ‘he did not remove his eyes from her’. His eyes were in slits, indicating anger and at some point, he was excessively gesticulating his hands indicating that he was forcefully explaining something to the female.\r\nI observed that proxemics for the park as a space was clearly loosely defined as to the public territorial usage; the subjects were clearly using the space for ‘personal’ purposes. Movement and body position of my subjects hinges towards nix emotional responses, ost specially that of charged anger. The subjects exhibited negative attitudes, and loosely involuntary non-verbal communication. All messages transmitted between the two were conscous and deliberate a nd not subliminal; their conversation was intend to say something and both were equally aware of it.\r\nBibliography\r\nArgyle, M. (1988). tangible Communication. Madison: International UP.\r\n'