Elites And The Masses Essay -- essays research papers fc

Elites and the MassesThere are many theories pertaining to the nature of position in companionship. In modern society, it is historic to identify where and when violence is exercised, who benefits and who suffers from it cosmos exerted upon them. In this tradition, it is workoutful to examine the managerialist perspective.Managerialism focuses on organizations as the basis, or building block of analysis of society, to which all other aspects of society are subordinate to. These organizations use their resources in an attempt to dominate each other and society. Managerialism tells us that office is concentrated among a group of elites who control organizations, and use them as an means to gain more force-out and expand their realm of control. Organizational power is increasingly the most important force that explains the direction of change in some(prenominal) state and society (Alford and Friedland, p.174). Thus, elites are becoming the most important factor that determin es our society, and do non serve the full interests of society, but kinda attempt to manipulate the masses to better serve itself. Max weber&8217s theory of bureaucracy lends itself to the concept of the managerialism. He claims that as society becomes more integrated and complex, organizational elites come to be more hooked on specialists and experts, or bureaucracies to advise and influence them on decisions. Bureaucracies are groups of individuals doing specialized tasks which blend into a cohesive and efficient unit. Power becomes increasingly centralise within bureaucracies and the elites who control them because as they grow, becoming more powerful, they use that power to gain more control over the masses. Weber saw the historic development of societies as a movement toward rational forms of organization, that is, groups organized not on the basis of the authority of personalities and traditions but on the basis of limited functions to perform or objectives to meet (Mar ger p. 72). Weber often used the notion of a machine to illustrate what he meant by modern organizations, referring to peck as &8220cogs that serve the machine, losing their identity and creativity in the process. Although Weber admitted that both mechanization and bureaucracy to tieher created an extremely efficient and productive scotch system, they also worked to bui... ...with common interests who join together for a common goal, turn managerialism believes that power is centralized among a small group of elites who work to get more power, and will even manipulate the masses in their experience best interest. Pluralism believes that the citizens dictate to our government the proper policies to enact, when managerialism says that people in a position of power dictate policies to the public. In addition, pluralism assumes a consensus of values among individuals, time managerialism sees society working by conflict and coercionBibliographyAlford and Friedland, Chapter Seven, & 8220State and party in Managerial Perspective, in Powers of Theory, 1985, p.161-83.Martin Marger, Ch.4, &8220The Elite Model, in Elites and Masses (New York D. caravan Nostrand, 1981).George Ritzer, &8220The Weberian Theory of Rationalization and the McDonaldization of Contemporary Society, p 37-62 in P. Kivisto (ed.), Illuminating cordial like (Thousand Oaks, Pine Forge Press, 1998).C. Wright Mills, &8220The Structure of Power in America, in James Farganis (ed.), Ch. 11 &8220Conflict Theory, Readings in Social Theory (NY Mcgraw-Hill, 1996).