Flexibel Exchange Rate

A bendable exchange regime is always fracture than a fixed exchange rate regime. As both(prenominal) Kanika and Junyi behave stated, better exchange rate depends on the features of a particular economy- I am also of that opinion. Broadly, we know the advantages of the flexible exchange rate is that it allows countries to be more prepared against shocks and interior(prenominal) and orthogonal business cycles (as stated above). Additionally, in terms of foreign reserves of the country, they are not used to control the survey of the currency and therefore higher levels (of reserves) do not have to be substantiateed. In Chinas case- the Renminbi was fixed to the dollar sign till 2005 and they accumulated foreign reserves. Today there is mounting pressure on China to appreciate its currency. On perusing literature on fixed exchange rates, one crowd out identify that the fixed exchange rate go out subject speculation in the foreign exchange markets, due to its personality of fixing prices- but speculation will always move irrespective of the exchange rate regime.

In order to maintain exchange rate at the fixed level, he political sympathies will undertake measures to increase interest rates which will create deflationary pressures in the economy. This causes a negative issuance on society as demand employment falls. In conclusion, for example, after the Asian financial crisis, Malaysia pegged its currency to the dollar and this turn up to be a success. The above points prove that both the consideration and the charecteristics of the economy of the country matters and then we can assert whether A flexible exchange regime is always better than a fixed exchange rate regime or immorality versa. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper