war, and many did not share the patriot view of war as glorious. Different authors chose to book of facts this effect in different ways. Two authors that we studied in this class, Samuel Clemens and Stephen Crane, chose to address their own views of the war through pieces that incorporate elements of literary chaff. In this paper, I plan to show how Clemens and Crane employ elements of literary satire in order to present a view of war as anything but glorious.
To begin, it is important to define satire as it will be used in this paper. correspond to Dictionary.com, a satire is a literary work in which human vice or folly is attacked through irony, derision, or wit. This paper will focus primarily on twain elements of this definition: folly and irony. Folly, as used in this paper, is defined as lack of understanding or sense (Dictionary.com). banter has two definitions as relevant to this paper.
The first definition of irony is an outcome of events contrary to what was, or might have been, anticipate, and the southward is the indirect presentation of a contradiction between an expression and the context in which it occurs (Dictionary.com). By combining these definitions, one can arrive at the meaning of satire as it is used in this paper: a satire is a literary device used to attack human folly by means of either presenting the reader with an outcome that is the opposite of what was expected or through the indirect presentation of a contradiction between an expression and the context in which it occurs.If you want to make out a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment