Photographs and Video Tape as Evidence
Don Clayton
Everest
flagitious Evidence-4
Professor November
PHOTOGRAPGHS AND VIDEO TAPE AS EVIDENCE 2
Pictures and videos bay window tell a story that no one else buns; both pieces of evidence dont lie.
Photographs and videotapes are gushy evidence because they portray objects, persons,
or events not in the appealroom. Videotapes give in many doubles of an event or object, whereas
a photo presents only(prenominal) one picture. (ECollege.com; 2012) Photos and video tape can show
scarce what encounter, to whom it happen too, who done it, and how they done it.
In this case, the suspect, the mother of the dupe (the tiddler) will stated that she didnt
commit such an bite upon the child. However, the video and/or the photographs can tell the court
what happen; that the mother did abuse the child. Within the video tape the court; judge, jury,
prosecution and defense, and witnesses can see exactly what the mother did to the dupe, if she
apply any weapons, tape, rope, knife, her hands, etc.
They are able to watch, hear, see, and even
feel what the victim went through; which in any case is good for the verdict. In the photographs
the court is able to see what the victim looked like at that time the picture was taken. Even
within a picture the court can feel the victim pain.
I would compete that these two types of evidence; photographs and video tape should be
permissible in court because it shows what happen, and that without these two pieces of evidence
a child abuser and murder will walk free and whitethorn commit their crime again. I would also state
that all in all children are innocent, they trust some people that they should fear; in this case the parent.
That without these two tapes of evidence, the court will not wholly understand...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment