Joseph Stiglitz Article Critique

A Critique Joseph Stiglitz article : `Rich Countries , Poor PeopleDoes ball-shapedization widen the gap amongst the privileged and the poor ? Joseph Stiglitz offers burning(prenominal) insight on the continuing deliberations over the role of global frugal policies in the widening gap between the intact-bodied and the poor . Citing the deterioration in the earning of workers in the United States , he asserts that there is a global plus in the human activity of poor people , even in he close to highly-developed countries same(p) the United States . The wages of the low subdue workers including the semi skil conduct and the unskilled has taken a launch with increased globalization He hike cites the imperfection of in the global markets , making the distribution of earnings inequitable across different countries , regions and economic classesTypifying the widespread practice of cost snip by companies in their bid to remain competitive , or diminution in a country s welfare remains by the government to remain efficient , Stiglitz sees globalization as creating a society in which the rich are check placed while the poor come about to suffer by means of increased expenses and decreased earnings This position is plausible since the liberal remnantructuring of the global economies , has made individuals with capital real winners while the rest , especially those living below the poverty line , continue to be poorIt is Stiglitz position that inter republical trade agreements such(prenominal) as GATT , WTO , NAFTA , only favour rich Nations . Truly , there is proof to these claims : He cites the case in which the disproportion between Mexico and the United States in terms of wealth distribution actually grew by more that 10 within the first Ten years afterward the signing of the NAFTA . The liberalization of trade through trade agreements such as NAFTA favours rich countries as they possess greater economic power through which they out bargain poor countries .

These agreements jumper cable to the opening of the domestic markets in the poor countries to products of the rich nation and vice versa leading to un jolly disceptation since the product of the developed countries are highly subsidized . Stiglitz gives the example of the Mexican maize competing with the highly subsidized American Corn . Definitely , fair competition in this scenario is not a realistic ideaHis plan , that due to the economic imbalance , in such agreements countries like Mexico (in this case above ) be allowed to maintain national obligation is a reasonable position as it would ensure fairer competition . Will unchecked globalization continue indefinitely Stiglitz further supports the need for adopting social polices that would reduce the gap between the rich and the poor since `unfettered globalization may not be sustained indefinitely . He gives the example of the period between the first and the Second World Wars , when massive levels of inequality led to protectionism which led to restrained trade between nationsWhat are the solutions to unrestrained globalization ? Stiglitz offers what he calls `the Scandinavian model in which countries increase investments in education , technology and security in gain to increasing progressive income tax though this last resource has drawn controversy as...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper